It appears, in the picture, that Jim Lane has a slight lead over Betsy Price. I don't know if that is currently the case in their horse race to become Mike Moncrief's replacement as mayor of Fort Worth.
Betsy Price is the Fort Worth Ruling Oligarchy's choice to be mayor. Jim Lane is also a member of the FWRO. But not the chosen one.
In the May 14 election that eliminated the non-FWRO candidates, Betsy got 43.3% of the vote, while Jim got 26.3%. Together, Betsy and Jim got 69.6% of the vote.
In the last mayoral election Mike Moncrief won by getting 70% of the 6% of the votes of the voters who bothered to vote. In the May 14 election more than 10% of the voters bothered to vote. With the percentage of votes going to the FWRO candidates virtually at the same 70% level as when only 6% voted.
This would seem to negate the theory that the way to overturn the FWRO is to get people to vote. If there was a 50% turnout would the FWRO still get around 70% of the vote? It would be interesting to find out. But, sadly, it will never happen.
There are too many fun things to do on a Saturday in Fort Worth, competing with voting, like going wakeboarding on the world's premiere wakeboard lake, for example.
Even though he is a charter member of the Fort Worth Ruling Oligarchy, I'm voting for Jim Lane. I think he may make an amusingly goofy replacement for the amusingly goofy Mike Moncrief.
Jim Lane has a Facebook page for his mayoral campaign. I gleaned a few good comments that I will share below...
Best quote of the day regarding supporting Jim Lane for Mayor:
"It's time to coalesce around a real leader for Fort Worth. Besides, Best Buy wants their logo back."
--Todd Hill, Democratic Activist
Fort Worth has taken the wrong path of leadership for years, it's time to "Get in the right Lane" besides; "The Price ain't Right"
---Joycia Sunshyne Johnson
I wish I lived in Fort Worth for this election. Betsy Price is a great lady, but there is nothing in her resume that qualifies her for mayor. Mayors have to think forward and VOTE ON MATTERS concerning: public safety, parks and recreation, setting property tax rates, street maintenance, water and sewer system maintenance, libraries, bond issues, employee salaries and benefits, long-range planning, attracting new businesses and on and on. So...Who talked Betsy Price into giving up a nice salary and why?
---Joe Forsythe
The gas drilling industry perhaps? Fort Worth needs a mayor that will regulate the excesses and public abuse caused by the gas drilling industry. I agree that Betsy Price is in no position to afford any protection or review of regulation to protect the Fort Worth public. I was looking to Cathy Hirt for that. I can only hope that Jim Lane is in a position to protect Fort Worth and it's residents should he be elected.
---Paul Philip Holt
____________________________________________________
A lot of people seem to be wondering why Betsy Price is willing to give up a job that pays over $100,000 a year for one that pays considerably less.
I have asked if maybe Betsy Price is independently wealthy so the change in income is meaningless. Or maybe she is married to someone who makes a lot of money, rendering the change in income meaningless.
Mayor Mike Moncrief made millions during his tenure as mayor from the gas companies poking holes all over his town. Maybe Betsy Price has figured out her own way of getting money from the gas drillers. I understand she is very good at handling large amounts of money.
When asked why she was running for mayor, Betsy Price said she was doing so because the Queen of the Fort Worth Ruling Oligarchy, Kay Granger, asked her to. Maybe Kay also promised to make up the income difference after Betsy's installation as mayor.
4 comments:
The FW mayor's office is a just a stepping stone for Jim Lane and Betsy Price.
Lane and Price are jockeying to make a run for Kay Granger's congressional seat when Granger retires.
Wendy Davis probably wants Granger's job too.
You should also check out dfwi.org, Durango. "Julie Hatch" promotes their stuff on Jim Lane's page and elsewhere.
On June 9 they are hosting "an old fashioned political picnic" with Lane and Price. If you're a member of DFWI, you only have to pay $50, but non-members have to pay $60. Or you could kick in thousands to be a sponsor. (Burnett Park is a public, city park but they can charge admission?)
Or you could go to their "Over The Edge" rappelling event that Moncrief got upside down over. It's for charity -- and the charity apparently is DFWI itself. For only $1,000 you can help their marketing efforts for even more events.
DFWI is an interesting group. You can join for as little as $350 a year.
It's the Wrong Lane, and the Price ain't right either. How can an American city right in the buckle of the Bible Belt be so morally anemic at best and bankrupt at worst? I often wonder if we are really part of America, the same one that sets aside a day to remember and honor those in out history who had given to all so we can be free people. Not part of a herd in Cowtown being
corralled to do what those in power want.
This is one of the goofiest pictures I've ever seen. Made me smile.
Post a Comment