Thursday, October 23, 2014
Voting On User Fees Of $1 To $2 For Fort Worth Livestock Stalls Is Ridiculous
Has the Fort Worth Star-Telegram taken an editorial position on this serious issue of voting on Three Propositions related to the new Fort Worth Multipurpose Arena?
As in suggesting voters vote YES to these three ballot items. Three ballot items which are each basically the same thing, as in voting on user fees, such as whether or not to charge a $1 to $2 user fee on livestock stalls.
You reading this in parts of America that have real things to vote for on your ballots, trust me, I am not making this up. Voters are being asked to vote on Three Propositions regarding fees related to livestock stalls, parking and event tickets.
And somehow, though I've never seen an explanation as to how, voting on these Three Propositions has something to do with the building of a new arena.
Now, who or what is paying for these large yard signs telling people to vote for Props 1, 2 & 3?
I think I've opined previously that I don't understand why Fort Worth voters are not feeling a bit offput at the absurdity of having these Three Propositions on a ballot. Why have Fort Worth's voters not been given the opportunity to vote yes or no on the building of this arena?
I have lived in democratic areas of America where voters get to vote on things like new stadiums, arenas, ballparks. What a concept.
Til now I have never lived in a pseudo-democratic area of America where voters are asked to vote yes or no on user fees for livestock stalls.
Am I alone in thinking having these Three Propositions on a ballot is, well, sort of embarrassing?
I think I will go early vote now. Any guesses as to how I'll be voting on the Three Propositions?